Allahabad High Court
/4364/2017 of RAM MILAN and ORS. Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO and ORS. on 4 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4364 of 2017 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Case called out. 2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. pertains to the year 2017. 3. From a perusal of the order sheet, it appears that both parties were initially ready to
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4364 of 2017
Court No. - 23
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Case called out.
2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. pertains to the year 2017.
3. From a perusal of the order sheet, it appears that both parties were initially ready to settle their dispute before the Mediation and Conciliation Center of this Court. In this regard, the amount deposited before the Mediation Center was to be released in favour of respondent no. 3 through a bank draft, and on 22.02.2018 a demand draft was handed over to respondent no. 3, Smt. Gayatri Devi. However, from the report of the Mediation Center, it appears that respondent no. 3 is not willing to participate in the mediation proceedings.
4. Today when the matter was called out, none appeared on behalf on behalf of the applicants to press application. Neither any adjournment slip nor any request on behalf of the applicants has been made to adjourn the case. No one has appeared on behalf of the private respondents.
5. Learned A.G.A. appearing for the State is present.
6. The application appears to have lost its efficacy due to efflux of time, hence, dismissed.
7. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. December 4, 2025 Renu/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Prahlad Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Govt. Advocate (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Ram Milan And Ors. .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko And Ors. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench