Allahabad High Court
/2001/2025 of MANORAM JAISWAL Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER on 4 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 2001 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s) and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed by the applicant(s) for the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 2001 of 2025
Court No. - 13
HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
3
Decisions referred to
In this index
2
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s) and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record.
2. The present application has been filed by the applicant(s) for the following main relief(s):- "WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside the Summoning order dated 25/07/2025 passed by ACJ (A. Kha.) Court No. 38, Sultanpur, in Criminal case no. 236 of 2025 in connection to case crime no. 0132 of 2025 Under section 115, 352, and 117(2)of BNS Sec 323,304,506,452,325 IPC : : PS Dhanpatgann District Sultanpur, along with the charge sheet no. 01 of 2025 dated 13/07/2025. The copies of which are contained as Annexure no. 1 and 2.;"
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant(s) submitted that at this stage, he is confining his prayer to seek the benefit of the judgment(s) passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116 for which liberty may be given to the applicant(s) and liberty may also be given to the applicant(s) to approach this Court again at appropriate stage for seeking appropriate relief.
4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant(s).
5. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for.
6. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today, they would not take any coercive action against the applicant(s) in the aforesaid case. It is made clear that in this regard, no application shall be entertained. December 4, 2025/Jyoti/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Onkar Pandey, Arjun Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Manoram Jaiswal .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench