Allahabad High Court
/7977/2025 of UTPAL KUMAR DE Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN.SECY. IRRIGATION WATER RESOURCES DEPTT. LKO AND ANOTHER on 4 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 7977 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to release total amount of medical
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 7977 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned Counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to release total amount of medical reimbursement in the account of the petitioner.
3. Mr. Diwakar Singh, learned State Counsel has adverted to letter appended as Annexure - 4 to the writ petition dated 21.05.2025 to submit that petitioner was in fact seeking reimbursement of Rs.4,700/- which had been deducted from the medical reimbursement bills. He has been provided written instructions dated 13.08.2025 which are taken on record and as per which Rs.4,700/- has already been credited in the account of petitioner on 01.08.2025.
4. Learned counsel for petitioner does not have any instructions regarding the same.
5. From perusal of the letter dated 21.05.2025 submitted by petitioner through Speed Post, it is evident that petitioner had sought reimbursement of Rs.1,54,706/- but was granted reimbursement only Rs.1,50,006/- and therefore claimed difference amount of Rs. 4,700/-.
6. However, in view of the instructions and indication of details of amount credited in the account of petitioner, nothing more remains to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Maurya, Geeta Shakya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Utpal Kumar De .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Irrigation Water Resources Deptt. Lko And Another .....Respondent(s)
be adjudicated upon in this petition, which is accordingly consigned to record without any adverse effect upon benefits already granted to the petitioner. December 4, 2025 lakshman WRIA No. 7977 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench