Allahabad High Court
/14035/2025 of ARVIND KUMAR MISHRA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. OF FOREST DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 4 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14035 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:- " (i) issue a writ, order or direction in the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 14035 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:- " (i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite parties counted the service of petitioner since 01/12/1984 to due date of regularization the petitioner on 20/9/2005 for with all pensionary benefits.
(ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite parties follows the Apex court has settled the controversy in Appeal No. 6798/2019 (Prem Singh Vs. State of U.P. & Others) as well as passed by this Hon'ble court in the case of Jai Ram Sharma Vs. State of U.P. & Others decided on 04/11/2025 contained as Annexure No. 6 to this writ petition. "
3. Learned counsel for petitioner has relied upon judgment rendered by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Prem Singh v. State of U.P. and others reported in (2019) 10 SCC 516 as well as judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Jai Ram Sharma v. State of U.P. and others [WRIT - A No. - 731 of 2024].
4. Since petitioner's grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nand Kishore, Raj Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Arvind Kumar Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Of Forest Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
representation before opposite party No. 2 i.e. Chief Conservator of Forest Department, U.P. Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided in the light of judgments rendered in the cases of Prem Singh (supra) and Jai Ram Sharma (supra) in case the same are applicable,within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
4. The petition stands disposed of. December 4, 2025 prabhat WRIA No. 14035 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench