Allahabad High Court
/13881/2025 of RAMASHRYA MANI TRIPATHI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. INFRA STRUCTURE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. ANUBHAG AND 3 OTHERS on 4 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13881 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Amendment application filed today is taken on record. 3. Since it pertains to the relief as sought in
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 13881 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Amendment application filed today is taken on record.
3. Since it pertains to the relief as sought in the writ petition, consequential amendments be incorporated during the course of day.
4. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties for removal of irrelevant and unwarranted conditions imposed by Government Order dated 03.12.1996 with regard to grant of pay- scale.
5. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.1 i.e. The State of U.P. through the Principal Secretary Infrastructure and Industrial Development Department, Anubhag-2, Civil Secretariat, Lok Bhawan, U.P., Lucknow - 226001 - or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
6. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. December 4, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anuj Mishra, Laxmi Kant Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Ramashrya Mani Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Infra Structure Industrial Development Deptt. Anubhag And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench