Allahabad High Court
/11788/2025 of VISHAL SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOUSING URBAN PLANNING DEPTT. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS on 4 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11788 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. We have heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State Respondent and Sri Umesh Kumar, Advocate, who
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 11788 of 2025
Court No. - 2
HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. We have heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State Respondent and Sri Umesh Kumar, Advocate, who has filed power on behalf of the respondent no.5.
2. This petition has been filed with the following main prayer:- "ISSUE a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties no. 1 to 5 to remove encroachment of opposite parties no. 6 and 7 from the land of Rasta of petitioner situated in village Amrai Gaon, Ward Shaheed Bhagat Singh, adjoining to "Basera Guest House" Tehsil and District Lucknow."
3. It is the case of the petitioner that he is living in a house in Keshav Nagar, Sitapur Road, Lucknow. The land of Gata No.467, which is next to the land of Gata nos.466 and 468 Min., where the house of the petitioner is situated, has been used by the private respondent for constructing "Basera Guest House" and is obstructing egress and ingress of the petitioner to his land.
4. The petitioner has given an I.G.R.S. complaint on 21.08.2025. The Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amarjeet Singh, Krishna Gopal, Sandeep Kumar Ojha, Touqeer Ahmad Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ratnesh Chandra Vishal Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Housing Urban Planning Deptt. Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s)
L.D.A. has informed on such complaint that such construction was being carried out illegally as no building map was sanctioned by the L.D.A. Yet the L.D.A. has not taken any further steps.
5. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the L.D.A., on the basis of instructions, says that a building map has now been submitted by the respondent nos.6 and 7 and it is in the process of being sanctioned.
6. This petition is disposed of with a direction to the Lucknow Development Authority to not permit any construction without first sanctioning the building map of such construction, if any, which has been submitted by the respondent nos.6 and 7 after the complaint made by the petitioner. December 4, 2025 Rahul WRIC No. 11788 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAHUL TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench