Allahabad High Court
A227/827/2016 of SANJAY KUMAR and 2 OTHERS U/A-227 Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECRETARY CONSOLIDATION and 4 OTHERS on 4 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 827 of 2016 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Standing counsel for the State - respondents. 1. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispense with.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 827 of 2016
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Standing counsel for the State - respondents.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispense with.
2. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No.2 -Deputy Director of Consolidation, Ambedkar Nagar to decide recall application No.242 of 2015 (Sanjay Kumar and others Vs. Shiv Murti and others), expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no.2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.2 -Deputy Director of Consolidation, Ambedkar Nagar is directed to decide recall application No.242 of 2015 (Sanjay Kumar and others Vs. Shiv Murti and others) expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment.
6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
3. December 4, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sharad Srivastava, Om Chandra Sahu, Prem Prakash Singh, Shiv Kumar Soni Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Sanjay Kumar And 2 Others U/A-227 .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secretary Consolidation And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench