/10161/2025 of SHESHRAM Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND ANOTHER on 4 December 2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record.

2. The present application has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):- "Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to Quash / Set aside the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 502 of 2024, arising out of Case Crime No. 169 of 2023 Under Section 323, 504, 506 of I.P.C., Police Station - Naveen Modern Police Station, District Shravasti. (State of U.P. Versus Sheshram), Pending before the Learned Court No.-5 Civil Judge (Junior Division) / Judicial Magistrate, Shravasti as well as impugned charge sheet submitted by the investigating officer against the petitioner Dated -03112023 and also Quash / Set aside the impugned Summoning order dated: 23-01-2024 Passed by the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shravasti and also Quash / Set aside the Bailable Warrant Order Dated: 06-10- 2025 Passed by the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Shravasti."

3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that at this stage, he is confining his prayer to seek the benefit of the judgment(s) passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116 for which liberty may be given to the applicant and liberty may also be given to the applicant to approach this Court again at appropriate stage for seeking appropriate relief.

4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bhairo Nath, Amit Bhardwaj Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sheshram .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s)

5. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for.

6. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today, they would not take any coercive action against the applicant in the aforesaid case. It is made clear that in this regard, no application shall be entertained. December 4, 2025 Arun/- A482 No. 10161 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench