Allahabad High Court
/804/2020 of SIDDH NATH SHARMA Vs STATE OF U.P. and ANR. on 4 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 804 of 2020 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been filed with prayer to quash
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 804 of 2020 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been filed with prayer to quash the impugned charge-sheet dated 30.6.2017 as well as the subsequent proceedings of Criminal Case No. 9884/2019 arsing out of Case Crime No.689/2017, under Sections 354,352,504 IPC, P.S.- Hardi, District- Bahraich. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicant is not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicant appears before the trial court within Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashok Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Siddh Nath Sharma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And Anr. .....Opposite Party(s)
three weeks from today and files bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). For a period of three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. The application is disposed of accordingly. December 4, 2025 Shravan A482 No. 804 of 2020 2 (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench