Allahabad High Court
WRIA/13963/2025 of SAFDAR SULTAN AND 6 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY., SECRETARIAT, ADMINISTRATION DEPTT. LKO. AND 8 OTHERS on 3 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13963 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner(s) and learned State Counsel for the opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed challenging provision to the extent stating restoration period of 15
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 13963 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner(s) and learned State Counsel for the opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed challenging provision to the extent stating restoration period of 15 years in the U.P. Civil Pension (Commutation) Rules 1941 as amended by Government Orders and seeking restoration of the commuted pension after expiry of 10 years 11 months or at best 11 years instead of 15 years as provided in relevant Government Order dated 08.12.2008.
3. Learned counsel for the parties admit that the case of the petitioner(s) is squarely covered by judgment of this Court in WRIT - A No. - 5617 of 2024 (Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava And Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Finance Lko 3 Others) and other connected matters decided on 28.05.2025.
4. Considering aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of finally providing that petitioner(s) of this writ petition shall also be entitled to benefit of judgment rendered in WRIT - A No. - 5617 of 2024 (Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava And Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Finance Lko 3 Others). December 3, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Safdar Sultan And 6 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Secretariat, Administration Deptt. Lko. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench