Allahabad High Court

WRIA/13962/2025 of RAVI KUMAR (CONSTABLE PNO NO. 181750204) AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 3 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13962 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Pushpendra Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned State Counsel for pposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - A No. - 13962 of 2025

Court No. - 7

HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Sri Pushpendra Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned State Counsel for pposite parties.

2. Present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking a writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties to send back the petitioners from their attachment place i.e. U.P. Dial-112 Project, District Ghazipur to their parent Department i.e. P.A.C..

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have completed more than 3 years of their posting at Dial 100/112. He further submits that as per the relevant Government Order issued in this respect, police personnel posted at Dial 100/112 should not remain posted for more than 3 years. It is further submitted that letters have been written by the competent authority for posting police personnel, who have completed more than 3 years of their posting at Dial 100/112, to some other place but the petitioners have not been relieved from their present place of posting to be posted elsewhere.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners may be given liberty to approach respondent No.2 for taking appropriate action relieving them from their present place of posting and post them elsewhere.

5. Considering the aforesaid submission, present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file individual Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pushpendra Kumar Sharma, Gurucharan Kashyap Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ravi Kumar (Constable Pno No. 181750204) And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)

representations before the competent authority i.e. Additional Director General of Police (Establishment) D.G.P. Headquarter, Lucknow U.P. (respondent no. 2) for relief of posting them out from Dial 100/112, who should consider the grievance of the petitioners and pass appropriate orders within a period of two months from the date petitioners approach him for the relief sought in the writ petition. December 3, 2025 lakshman WRIA No. 13962 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead