Allahabad High Court
WRIA/12188/2025 of BIRENDRA SINGH AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 3 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12188 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner(s) and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 12188 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner(s) and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to provide pension along with all consequential benefits by including service rendered by petitioners as daily wages/work charge employees for purposes of qualifying service for pensionary benefits. Prayer has also been made for grant of pay-scale, benefits of assured career progression and all consequential benefits.
3. Learned counsel for petitioner has relied upon judgment rendered by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Prem Singh v. State of U.P. and others reported in (2019) 10 SCC 516 as well as judgment rendered by this Court in Jai Ram Sharma v. State of U.P. and others [WRIT - A No. - 731 of 2024].
4. Since considering petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to file fresh individual representations before opposite party no.1 i.e. Principal Secretary, Department of Irrigation and Water Resources, Civil Secretariat, U.P., Lucknow or any other competent authority. In case such representations are filed, the same are required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously in the light of judgments rendered in the cases of Prem Singh (supra) and Jai Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : S.P. Singh Somvanshi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Birendra Singh And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Irrigation And Water Resources Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
Ram Sharma (supra) in case the same are applicable, within a period of eight weeks from receipt of representation(s) of petitioners along with a certified copy of this order.
5. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. December 3, 2025 prabhat WRIA No. 12188 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench