Allahabad High Court

A483/1020/2025 of ARCHANA SAHOO Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME U.P. LKO. AND 7 OTHERS on 3 December 2025

Cites 3, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 1020 of 2025 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been preferred seeking direction to

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 1020 of 2025

Court No. - 23

HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

3

Decisions referred to

In this index

2

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and perused the record.

2. The instant application has been preferred seeking direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division)/F.T.C.-Ist, Pratapgarh to decide case no.91/2021, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. & Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station- Mahila Thana, District- Pratapgarh (State Vs. Umesh Kumar Sahoo & others), pending before him expeditiously.

3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case indicated in the application including the period of pendency of the case in issue, the present application is disposed of with a direction to the Court concerned to make all endeavour for concluding the proceedings of the case in issue, expeditiously, as according to various pronouncements of the Hon'ble Apex Court including the judgment(s) passed in the case of Maneka Gandhi Versus Union of India and Another (1978) 1 SCC 248, Hussainara Khatoon Versus Home Secretary, State of Bihar (1980) 1 SCC 81, Kadra Pahadiya and Others Versus State of Bihar (1981) 3 SCC 671, the right to speedy trial/disposal of the case is implicit under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. December 3, 2025 Anand/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sameer Shukla, Anil Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Archana Sahoo .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home U.P. Lko. And 7 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead