Allahabad High Court
A482/10245/2025 of MANISH KUMAR YADAV Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER on 3 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10245 of 2025 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed with a prayer to quash the entire
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10245 of 2025
Court No. - 23
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. The present application has been filed with a prayer to quash the entire proceedings of Non-Bailable Warrant Order dated 17.07.2023 passed by learned Additional Session Judge Court No.3rd, Unnao, on the basis of Charge Sheet No. 01/2019, dated 01.09.2019, in Session Trial No. 0232/2019, arising out of FIR/ Case Crime No. 0376/2019, under Sections 379, 411, 413 IPC, Police Station Maurawan, District Unnao, styled as State Vs. Sunil Kumar Kushwaha and another, as contained in Annexure No.1 and 2 to this application, during the pendency of this application.
3. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicant may be permitted to move bail application in light of judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.5191 of 2021, before the court concerned and suitable directions may be issued that same may be heard and decided expeditiously, in accordance to law.
4. In view of the above, the application is disposed of with a direction to Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Salman, Ana Fatma, Arshad Jameel, Mukhtar Ahamad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Manish Kumar Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
the court concerned that if the applicant applies for bail before the court concerned within four weeks from today, his prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously, in accordance with law.
4. For a period of four weeks from today or till the applicant applies for bail, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. December 3, 2025 Muk A482 No. 10245 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench