A482/10226/2025 of DEV PRAKASH PANDEY AND 6 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER on 3 December 2025

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10226 of 2025 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Shri Saket Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Saket Tiwari, Advocate on behalf of respondent no.2, is taken on record. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been filed with prayer to quash the further proceedings of Case Crime No.106/2025 under Sections 191(2), 191 (3), 115(2), 351(3), 352, 333 and 109(1) B.N.S., Police Station Raunahi, District Ayodhya. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicant is innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicants are not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. From perusal of record, it appears that it is a case of cross F.I.R. Injuries have been sustained by both sides. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Suyesh Pradhan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Dev Prakash Pandey And 6 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and files bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). However, the applicants are at liberty to raise their pleadings which were made here in this petition, before the trial court and the same shall be considered and decided by the concerned trial on merits after hearing both the parties. The application is disposed of accordingly. December 3, 2025 Shukla A482 No. 10226 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench