Allahabad High Court
A227/7000/2025 of RAKSHA RAM AND 3 OTHERS Vs SETTLEMENT CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, SHRAWASTI AND OTHERS on 3 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7000 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Meva Lal Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7000 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Meva Lal Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Settlement Officer (Consolidation), District - Shrawasti, to decide Appeal No. 202454086200000149 - Raksha Ram Vs. Settlement Officer Consolidation, U/S 11(i) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. respondent No. 1 - Settlement Officer (Consolidation), District - Shrawasti, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. respondent No. 1 - Settlement Officer (Consolidation), District - Shrawasti, is directed to decide Appeal No. 202454086200000149 - Raksha Ram Vs. Settlement Officer Consolidation, U/S 11(i) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
December 3, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Meva Lal Yadav, Harshita Gupta, Saddam Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Raksha Ram And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) Settlement Consolidation Officer, Shrawasti And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench