Allahabad High Court

CRLP/11279/2025 of COMPLAINANT OF CASE CRIME NO.-73/2025, INHAUNA, AMETHI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND OTHERS on 3 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11279 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State-respondents. 2. Instant criminal writ petition has been

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11279 of 2025

Court No. - 11

HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.

HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State-respondents.

2. Instant criminal writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondents to conduct a fair and proper investigation in pursuance to the First Information Report dated 01.10.2025 registered as Case Crime No. 0073 of 2025 under Section 64 (1), 61 (2), 352, 353 (3) of B.N.S, 2023 at Police Station- Inhauna District- Amethi, a copy of which is annexure 1 to the writ petition.

3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the aforesaid First Information Report having been lodged, the respondents- authorities are not investigating the matter fairly.

4. Responding learned AGA on the basis of instructions Sent by Sri Dinesh Kumar Mishra, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Amethi dated 01.12.2025 states that a final report dated 27.11.2025 has been submitted before the supervisory authority.

5. In this regard, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would like to submit an application which application may be directed to be considered and decided within a specified time. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saggir Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Complainant Of Case Crime No.-73/2025, Inhauna, Amethi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Civil Sectt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)

6. To the aforesaid prayer, learned AGA has no objection.

7. Accordingly, without entering into the merits of the case, the instant criminal writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to submit an application ventilating her grievances before the respondents- authorities within a week from today. In case, such an application is submitted by the petitioner then the respondents-authorities shall proceed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law which application would be decided within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of such application along with certified copy of this order. December 3, 2025 Pachhere/- CRLP No. 11279 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead