Allahabad High Court
A482/10253/2025 of PANKAJ Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. on 3 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10253 of 2025 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed with a prayer to quash the every proceeding
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10253 of 2025
Court No. - 23
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. The present application has been filed with a prayer to quash the every proceeding arising out of charge sheet dated 04.08.2023, S.T. No. 1900 of 2023, Crime No. 224 of 2023, under Sections 2/3 U.P. Gangster Act, Police Station Laharpur, District Sitapur, pending in the court of Addl. Session Judge-9, (Gangster Act), District Sitapur, State Vs. Azad and others, as contained in Annexure No.2 to the petition.
3. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he may be granted three weeks' time to appear before the learned trial court and the trial court be directed to decide the Non Bailable Warrant expeditiously.
4. Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
5. In view of the above, the application is disposed of with a direction to the learned Trial Court that if the applicant appears within a period of three weeks, his NBW shall be decided expeditiously, in accordance with law.
4. For a period of three weeks from today or till the applicant applies for bail, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case.
December 3, 2025 Muk Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rakesh Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Pankaj .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench