Allahabad High Court
CRLP/3139/2025 of SANDHYA BAJPAI AND 3 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU.PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 3 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3139 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Government Advocate for respondents no.1 to 3. 2. The instant petition has been
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3139 of 2025
Court No. - 11
HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Government Advocate for respondents no.1 to 3.
2. The instant petition has been filed praying for quashing for the F.I.R. dated 06.04.2025 registered as F.I.R. No.147 of 2025, under Sections 61(2), 221, 305(e), 308(5), 356(2) of B.N.S., 2023, Police Station Gomti Nagar, District Lucknow.
3. At the very outset, learned A.G.A., on the basis of sent of instructions sent by Sri Zaseem Raza, Sub-Inspector, Police Station Gomti Nagar, District Lucknow, states, that charge sheet dated 23.07.2025 has been filed before the supervisory authority against Amol Bajpai (petitioner no.3), Rahul Rajpoot and Aman Sharma, whereas the names of petitioners no.1,2 and 4, namely, Sandhya Bajpai, Apurva Bajpai and Ram Kumar Bajpai have been dropped.
4. On the same being pointed out, learned counsel for the petitioners states that he does not intend to press on with the writ petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as not pressed with a liberty to the petitioner to pursue other remedies as may be available to them.
5. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty.
6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. December 3, 2025 Renu/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ripu Daman Shahi, Apoorv Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Anurag.S.Kaalesh (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Sandhya Bajpai And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru.Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench