Allahabad High Court
WRIB/1118/2025 of TRIVENDRAM SINGH AND OTHERS Vs BOARD OF REVENUE, U.P. LKO. THRU. MEMBER JUDICIAL AND OTHERS on 3 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - B No. - 1118 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. Heard Sri Shobhit Mohan Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing counsel on behalf of respondent No.s 1, 2 and 3 and Sri Mohan Singh for respondent No.4 while vakalatnama along
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - B No. - 1118 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Heard Sri Shobhit Mohan Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing counsel on behalf of respondent No.s 1, 2 and 3 and Sri Mohan Singh for respondent No.4 while vakalatnama along with short counter affidavit has been filed by Sri Upendra Maurya for respondent No.s 5 and 6 which is taken on record.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The controversy with regard to the mutation of the land of khata No.s 42, 43 and 44 situated in Village Masaina Mirzapur, Pargana Bidhar, Tehsil Alapur, District Ambedkar Nagar was the issue which is pending before the Board of Revenue in revision No.REV/4445/2025, computerized No.R-20250404004445 preferred by respondent No.s 5 and 6 against the order dated 25.9.2025 passed by Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil Ram Nagar, Tehsil Alapur while the Board of Revenue by means of the impugned order dated 27.10.2025 has admitted the revision and also granted interim protection to the private respondents against which the present writ petition has been filed.
2. After arguing the matter at some length learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievance of the petitioners shall stand substantially redressed in case the Board of Revenue is directed to
3. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shobhit Mohan Shukla, Shraddha Agarwal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Trivendram Singh And Others .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue, U.P. Lko. Thru. Member Judicial And Others .....Respondent(s)
conclude the revisional proceedings with expedition.
Learned counsel for the respondents also do not oppose the innocuous prayer made by the petitioners.
4. Accordingly, without entering into the merits of the controversy, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Board of Revenue to decide the revision with expedition, say within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, in accordance with law.
5. Both the parties undertake to cooperate in the proceedings before the Board of Revenue and not to seek unnecessary adjournments.
6. December 3, 2025 RKM. WRIB No. 1118 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench