Allahabad High Court
WRIB/1132/2025 of VINOD KUMAR AND 3 OTHERS Vs DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION, HARDOI AND OTHERS on 3 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - B No. - 1132 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Jai Prakash Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 3. 2. Present dispute pertains to allotment of chak in Village -
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - B No. - 1132 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Jai Prakash Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 3.
2. Present dispute pertains to allotment of chak in Village - Bahadurnagar, Pargana - Pandarwa, Tehsil - Sahabad, District - Hardoi. Grievance of petitioners was with regard to allotment of entire chak situated at Gata No. 77 in favour of the petitioner alongwith Gata No. 98 on which boring of petitioner is existing. The Deputy Director of Consolidation after considering entire facts of the case, has declined to interfere in the said matter on account of the fact that with regard to chak situated over Gata No. 77, proceedings under the Consolidation of Holdings Act have already been concluded and dispute has been resolved at the stage of D.D.C. in another matter and consequently, D.D.C. in the impugned order dated 14.08.2025, while rejecting the revision of the petitioners has stated that he can not interfere in the judgment which has attained finality.
3. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition and seeks liberty to the petitioner to make appropriate application with regard to the dispute which has already been settled by the D.D.C.
4. Learned Standing Counsel does not dispute the above prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jai Prakash Yadav, Ram Achal Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey Vinod Kumar And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Hardoi And Others .....Respondent(s)
5. Accordingly, present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to assail the impugned order, in case he is so advised, at subsequent stage. December 3, 2025 A. Verma WRIB No. 1132 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench