Allahabad High Court
/604/2024 of PRABHAKAR PANDEY AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO AND OTHERS on 2 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 604 of 2024 Along with : 1. Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 606 of 2024: Shiv Saran Upadhyay and others Versus State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and others Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 604 of 2024
Along with :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 606 of 2024: Shiv Saran Upadhyay and others Versus State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and others Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.
1. Case called out. None for the petitioners to press the petition whereas learned AGA and Sri Sushil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the complainant are present.
2. These petitions have been filed challenging the F.I.R. dated 07.1.2024 vide Case Crime No.0008/2024, under Section 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B & 506 IPC, Police Station Wazirganj, District Lucknow.
3. Learned AGA as well as learned counsel for the complainant submits that the final report in the matter has been filed, therefore, these petitions have rendered infructuous.
4. Learned counsel for the complainant also placed before this Court an order dated 17.11.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.4948/2024, which has been disposed of recording the statement at Bar that the investigation has already been concluded and the final report has also been submitted. The order dated 17.11.2025 on reproduction reads as Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rama Kant Dixit Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Ramesh Kumar Mishra, Sushil Kumar Singh Prabhakar Pandey And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko And Others .....Respondent(s)
under:- "1. Rejoinder affidavit, filed today in Court, is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and the final report has also been submitted in favour of the accused persons. Consequent to submission of filing report, petitioner has already preferred a protest petition before the competent court, which is pending disposal.
4. Learned AGA could not dispute the aforesaid facts.
5. In view of the statement made, the instant writ petition is finally disposed of with the direction that the competent court shall pass an appropriate order on the protest petition in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible"
5. In view of above and since none is present to controvert the aforesaid, it appears that since the final report has been filed, therefore, the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the matter.
6. Dismissed accordingly. December 2, 2025 Akanksha Sri/- CRLP No. 604 of 2024 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench