Central Government Industrial Tribunal

Sh. Rajan Singh vs DDA & Anr on 28 October 2024

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT NO-II, NEW DELHI

I.D. No. 74/2023

Sh. Rajan Singh, S/o Sh. Badan Singh,

R/o House No-531, Kuan Mohalla Tughlakabad Village, New Delhi-110044.

Versus

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Delhi Development Authority of India, F7W8+XQW, DDA Park Tughlakabad, New Delhi-110044.

2. Gaurav Enterprises, Through- Gaurav, (Proprietor) A-467, Gali No-02, Meet Nagar, Saboli, Delhi-110094.

Appearance:- For Claimant: None For Managements: None for M-1.

Sh. Kumar Anshuman, Ld. AR for M-2

AWARD This is an application of U/S 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act (here in after referred as an Act). Claimant had stated in his claim statement that he had been working with the respondent since 01.12.2020 at the post of Gunman at the last drawn salary Rs. 32,000/- Per month. He did his work well and has not given any chance of making any complaint to the management nor he was charged while he was in service. During the services, management had obtained his signature on blank papers and has not been providing any legal facilities i.e. appointment letter, Leave Book, bonus, overtime, weekly and events holidays etc. When the workman demanded the same, without any rhyme or reason or without issuing any notice he was illegally terminated from his job by the management on 07.12.2021. He had sent the complaint to the labour commissioner, but, it has yielded no result. Hence, he has filed the present claim. Management-1 has not been appearing from the first date. Management-2 had filed his written statement denying the claim of the workman. He submits that workman has not completed 240 days of continuous services prior to his alleged termination from services. It is also submitted that during the course of his employment, he was found to be drunk during duty hours, so at the direction of principal employer his services were discontinued from DDA and was asked to report at Head Office of the answering management, but he failed to turned up and in this way he had left his employment at his own. He submits that claim is not maintainable and is liable to be dismissed.

Now, the matter is listed for filing of rejoinder on behalf of the claimant. No one has been appearing on behalf of the claimant for the last five dates. In these circumstances, when the claimant has not been appearing since long to substantiate his claim, it appears that he is not interested to pursue his case. His claim stands dismissed. Award is passed accordingly. A copy of this award is sent to the appropriate government for notification as required under section 17 of the ID act 1947. File is consigned to record room.

ATUL KUMAR GARG Date: 28.10.2024

Presiding Officer.

CGIT-cum-Labour Court-II

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead