Allahabad High Court
/410/2024 of ALI JAN Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME, LKO. AND OTHERS on 28 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 410 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Case called out. 2. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner nor any request for adjournment or pass over has been made whereas learned A.G.A.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 410 of 2024
Court No. - 10
HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Case called out.
2. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner nor any request for adjournment or pass over has been made whereas learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
3. This petition has been filed challenging an F.I.R. bearing Case Crime No.505/2023, under Sections 2/3 of U.P. Gangster & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Gurubux Ganj, District Raebareli.
4. Perusal of order sheet indicates that on the very first date, petitioner was directed to file legible typed true copy of the gang chart, which was filed by him and when the case was taken up on 31.01.2024, it was got adjourned, and, thereafter it has not been pursued.
5. Learned A.G.A., on the basis of instructions dated 28.10.2025 received from Sri Sarvesh Kumar Yadav, Sub Inspector, Police Station Gurbux Ganj, District Raebareli, submits that Charge Sheet No.522/2024 dated 06.11.2024 has been forwarded in the Court on 21.12.2024, therefore, this petition has lost its efficacy and the petitioner may avail appropriate remedy before the concerned Court or elsewhere, however, none is present to controvert the same. The said instructions are taken on record. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Firoz Ahmad Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Ali Jan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
6. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it appears that either the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter or it has rendered infructuous, therefore, no one is present on behalf of the petitioner.
7. Dismissed accordingly.
8. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. November 28, 2025 Saurabh CRLP No. 410 of 2024 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench