Allahabad High Court

/7230/2019 of ASIF and ANR. Vs STATE OF U.P. and ANR. on 28 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7230 of 2019 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. None appears on behalf of the petitioners. Shri Alok Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent no.2 and learned A.G.A. are present. In this case, the petitioners have prayed for the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7230 of 2019 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. None appears on behalf of the petitioners. Shri Alok Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent no.2 and learned A.G.A. are present. In this case, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs :- "Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to pass an order thereby allowing the petition by quashing the impugned order dated 17.09.2019 passed by the IXth Additional District and Sessiions Judge, Gonda by means of which the learned court concern has rejected the discharge application which was moved by the petitioners in Special Case No.201/2019 arising out of Case Crime No.267/2016 under Sections 308, 323, 504 I.P.C. Police Station Peasepur, Disdtrict Gonda ( State Vs. ASif and others) pending in the court of IXth Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gonda." In this case, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 filed a copy of the judgement passed in Sessions Trial No.201 of 2019 : State Vs. Asif and another, Crime No.267 of 2016 (supra) in which petitioner no.1 Asif and petitioner no.2 Arif have been acquitted from the charge of Sections 308, 323, 504 I.P.C. In view of the acquittal of the aforesaid accused/petitioners, now nothing remains to be adjudicated in the matter and the petition has become Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vijay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Alok Srivastava Asif And Anr. .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And Anr. .....Opposite Party(s)

infructuous. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. November 28, 2025 Shukla A482 No. 7230 of 2019 2 (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead