Allahabad High Court
/6921/2025 of SUDHIR KUMAR SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. COLLECTOR AYODHYA AND 13 OTHERS on 27 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6921 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents while Sri Mohan Singh is present for the Gaon Sabha- respondent No.12. 2.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6921 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents while Sri Mohan Singh is present for the Gaon Sabha- respondent No.12.
2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No.2 -Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Milkipur, District Ayodhya to decide case No.RST5834/2024, computerized Case No.T202404230405834 (Prabhat Kumar and others Vs. Vinay Kumar Singh and others) under Section 116 o U.P. Revenue Code, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no.2considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Milkipur, District Ayodhya is directed to decide case No.RST5834/2024, computerized Case No.T202404230405834 (Prabhat Kumar and others Vs. Vinay Kumar Singh and others) under Section 116 o U.P. Revenue Code, expeditiously, say within a period of one year, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment.
6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 27, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Sudhir Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Collector Ayodhya And 13 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench