Allahabad High Court
/6926/2025 of ISLAM ALI AND 2 OTHERS Vs ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER ADMINISTRATION SECOND DEVI PATAN DIVISION,GONDA AND 3 OTHERS on 27 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6926 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing counsel for the State respondents and Sri Pankaj Gupta for the Land Management Committee concerned. 2. Present
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6926 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing counsel for the State respondents and Sri Pankaj Gupta for the Land Management Committee concerned.
2. Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution has been filed with following prayer:- "Direct the Learned Revisional Court-Opposite Party No.1 to decide the interim application for stay in Revision No.355/2024, computerized Case No. C202408000000355 "Islam Ali and others Vs. Adhyaksh, Land Management Committee and others', under Section 333 of U.P. L.R. Act, 1950, filed by the petitioners on 19.02.2024, pending before him since 19.02.2024, expeditiously within time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court."
3. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that in the revision preferred by the petitioner the records have been summoned but till date no detailed objection has been filed by them nor interim order has been passed on the application for interim relief while on the other hand interference is being caused by the respondents on the disputed property for which there is requirement for expeditious disposal of the interim relief application. He further submits that the respondents have been served.
4. Learned State counsel does not oppose the aforesaid prayer.
5. Accordingly, considering the aforesaid submissions the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to consider and decided the application for interim relief with expedition, say within two weeks from the date service has been effected on the respondents, in case there is Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shikhar Deep Singh, Premkant, Vipin Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Islam Ali And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Additional Commissioner Administration Second Devi Patan Division,Gonda And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
no legal impediment.
6. In case, it is not possible to decide the same within the time prescribed above, he shall decide the same within two weeks thereafter.
7. It is further provided that in case it is not possible to decide the application for interim relief the respondent No.1 shall consider passing ad interim injunction if a case is so made out. November 27, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 6926 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench