Allahabad High Court
/13410/2025 of ANAMIKA SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF BAL VIKAS SEWA EVAM PUSHTAHAR VIBHAG LKO., AND 2 OTHERS on 27 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13410 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 3. Present petition under
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 13410 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
3. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to consider petitioner's transfer from District Gonda to Gautam Buddh Nagar or any adjoining District, in view of serious ailments being suffered by mother-in-law of petitioner.
4. Learned State Counsel has been provided written instruction dated 18.11.2025 a copy of which is taken on record and as per which petitioner is absconding from duty from 07.11.2021 and for which purpose, a charge sheet has already been served upon petitioner.
5. Learned counsel for petitioner however submits that no charge sheet has been served upon petitioner prior to filing of writ petition.
6. However, since the aspect of redressal of petitioner's grievance would entail administrative discretion, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Director Department of Bal Vikas Sewa Evam Pushtahar Vibhag, U.P., Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Kumar Yadav, Manoj Kumar Mishra, Saumya Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Anamika Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Bal Vikas Sewa Evam Pushtahar Vibhag Lko., And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of three weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order.
7. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. November 27, 2025 kvg/- WRIA No. 13410 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench