Allahabad High Court
CRLP/11131/2025 of RAMDULARI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND OTHERS on 27 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11131 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. The instant writ petition has been filed by the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11131 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the following reliefs:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby directing the opposite party no.2 to ensure the fair and impartial investigation to the aforesaid offence either by transferring the investigation to other competent officer or to himself monitor the same.
II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby directing the opposite parties no.2 and 3 to take immediate steps in connection to the first information report lodged by the petitioner at case crime no. 243 of 2025, under section 303(2), 351(2) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Police Station Bighapur, district Unnao and take action against the accused person i.e. opposite party no.4 to 6; and
III. Issue a writ, order or direction the nature of Mandamus thereby directing the opp. party no.2 and 3 to make sure that the petitioner and her family members may not be victimized, threatened and harassed by the opp. party no.4 to 6 in any manner." Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is the first informant in the present case and though the F.I.R. in the instant case has been registered on 11.09.2025, yet the police is not investigating the case in fair and impartial manner. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Srees Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Ramdulari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
In view of the above, the petitioner may move an application before the respondent no.2- Superintendent of Police, Unnao, highlighting her grievance and seeking fair and impartial investigation and if such an application is moved by the petitioner, respondent no.2- Superintendent of Police, Lucknow, shall ensure the fair, impartial and expeditious investigation in the present case. With the aforesaid order, the present writ petition stands disposed of. November 27, 2025 Haseen U. CRLP No. 11131 of 2025 2 (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench