Allahabad High Court
/11155/2025 of SMT. PRIYANKA SINGH Vs UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS on 27 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11155 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. and Shri Kuldeep Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 3 and 4. 2.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11155 of 2025
Court No. - 30
HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. and Shri Kuldeep Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 3 and 4.
2. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the learned court having jurisdiction/authority concerned to consider the case of petitioner in light of direction of order dated 1.7.2024 passed by this Hon'ble Court in CRLP No. 20172/2023, Prakash Chandra Tiwari Vs. Union of Indian and others, (contained as Annexure No. 1), in the interest of justice; and/or.
ii) To pass such other and further orders which may deem to be just and appropriate in the facts and circumstances of the case.
iii) To award the cost and compensation to the petitioner in the interest of justice."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to move application under Section 8 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 before the concerned court after disposal of the Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Dairy No(s). 5578 of 2025; Asif Naseem Versus Union of India and others by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. To which there is no objection by the other side.
4. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the liberty as aforesaid. November 27, 2025 KU Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Surya Deep, Ayush Srivastava, Puskar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., G.A., Kuldeep Srivastava (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Smt. Priyanka Singh .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Finance, New Delhi And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench