Allahabad High Court
/10854/2025 of GEETA YADAV Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS on 27 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10854 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing counsel for State-respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed issuance of notice to the private respondent is
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 10854 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing counsel for State-respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed issuance of notice to the private respondent is dispensed with.
3. By means of the present writ petition the petitioner has prayed for a direction to State-respondents to execute demarcation order dated 20.01.2023 in Case No. T 202202570402344 passed by S.D.M., Tehsil Patti District Pratapgarh U/S 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
3. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection and submits that petitioner has efficacious remedy of moving appropriate application under Para 460 of Revenue Court Manual for execution of the orders passed by revenue authorities and without approaching the competent authority, present writ petition has been filed.
4. In light of the above, considering that the petitioner has efficacious remedy of moving appropriate application under Para 460 of Revenue Court Manual, this Court declines to interfere with the present matter.
5. Accordingly, without entering into merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move an application under para 460 of the U.P. Revenue Court Manual, before the competent authority within two weeks from today and in case such an application is Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Dhuriya, Anil Kumar Nishad Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Geeta Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
made within the prescribed period, the said authority is directed to proceed to consider and decide the same expeditiously, in accordance with law. November 27, 2025 Ravi/ WRIC No. 10854 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench