Allahabad High Court
/11337/2025 of VANSHRAJ SAROJ AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS on 27 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11337 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Shri Anubhav Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondents no. 1 to 4 and Shri Mohan Singh for respondents no. 5 and 6. 2. It has been
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 11337 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Shri Anubhav Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondents no. 1 to 4 and Shri Mohan Singh for respondents no. 5 and 6.
2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are the resident of Village Sonari, Pargana Aasal, Tehsil and District Amethi, Uttar Pradesh and landless agriculturists and accordingly steps were initiated for allotment of the land to the persons who are eligible. The petitioners have moved appropriate application before the Management Committee, who duly considered the case of the petitioners and fulfills all the conditions, a proposal was passed in their favour.
3. It has subsequently been submitted that the proposal has been forwarded for its approval to opposite party no.3/ Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil and District Amethi, Uttar Pradesh, which is pending and no decision has been taken till date.
4. It is in the aforesaid circumstances, the petitioners approached this Court seeking direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate i.e. opposite party no.3 to consider and decide the said matter, expeditiously.
5. Learned Standing Counsel does not oppose the prayer made by the petitioners.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to opposite party no.3 to take a decision on the proposal dated 1.8.2024, submitted by the Land Management Committee Gaon Sabha Sonari, Pargana Aasal, Tehsil & District Amethi, expeditiously, say within a period six weeks, from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before it, in accordance with law, November 27, 2025 Ravi/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anubhav Srivastava, Ankit Gupta, Ankita Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Vanshraj Saroj And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench