Allahabad High Court

/11217/2025 of VINITA AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS on 27 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11217 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Heard Sri Amit Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. This petition has been filed seeking following main

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11217 of 2025

Court No. - 10

HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.

HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Sri Amit Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. This petition has been filed seeking following main relief:- "(i) a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no.1 to 3 not to harass the petitioners on the behest of the opposite party no.4, in the interest of justice."

3. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that both the petitioners are major and they have married with each other by their own free will on 20.11.2025 as per Hindu rites at Arya Samaj Mandir, Sector- H, Aliganj, Lucknow. Copy of their marriage certificate issued from the Arya Samaj Mandir is annexed as Annexure No.1 to the writ petition. In regard to their age, the petitioner No.1 has annexed copy of her Aadhaar Card & Ration Card whereas petitioner No.2 has annexed copy of his Aadhaar Card as Annexure Nos.2 and 3 to the writ petition respectively. They are enjoying and living peaceful matrimonial life. However, opposite party no.4, who is father of the petitioner No.1, is not happy with the marriage, therefore, on his instance, the police is harassing the petitioners. So, they have approached this Court, for redressal of their grievances, by filing the present writ petition.

4. Learned A.G.A., on the basis of instructions dated 24.11.2025 received Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Vinita And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)

from Sri Pushkar Verma, Sub Inspector, Police Station Dhauraha, District Kheri, submits that no F.I.R. or Missing Report has been registered at the concerned police station and the police is not interfering in the peaceful life of the petitioners, who are enjoying their marital life happily. The said instructions are taken on record.

5. In view of above, there is no occasion to disbelieve the statement of learned A.G.A. on the basis of aforesaid instructions and this petition is disposed of in terms of the statement of learned A.G.A. November 27, 2025 Saurabh CRLP No. 11217 of 2025 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead