Allahabad High Court
/13749/2025 of ANIL KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. PWD LKO AND 4 OTHERS on 27 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13749 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following reliefs:- "( a ) To issue a writ, order or
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 13749 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following reliefs:- "(a) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus and commanding the Opposite parties to pay post retiral dues of the petitioner viz. Gratuity, GPF, Group Insurance and pension including arrears of pension with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of its due till the date of actual payment.
(b) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus and commanding the Opposite parties to regularize the services of the petitioner w.e.f. 10.2.2000 as directed by the Learned Labour Court and also to grant financial up-gradation under ACP Scheme on completion of 10 years and 16 years of service respectively by revising the pensionary benefits and also to pay arrears thereof with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of its due till the date of actual payment."
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Engineer-in-Chief, Vyasthapan (Gha Varg), Department of Public Works Department, Uttar Pradesh, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dharm Raj Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Anil Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Pwd Lko And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
Lucknow - or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. November 27, 2025 lakshman WRIA No. 13749 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench