Allahabad High Court
WRIA/5322/2024 of OM PRAKASH SAXENA AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF IRRIGATION LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 27 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 5322 of 2024 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking following main prayers:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 5322 of 2024
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking following main prayers:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Opposite Party No.2 to compute the period of services rendered by the Petitioners as Work Charge Employees for the purpose of qualifying service for grant of pension and other retiral benefits.
(ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent to pay pension to the petitioners after computing the period of work charge in regular service, in the interest of justice."
3. It has been submitted that the question involved in the instant petition has already been by this Court in the case of Jai Ram Sharma v. State of U.P. and others, Writ-A No. 731 of 2024.
4. Since considering petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to file fresh individual representations before the competent authority who shall consider and decide the same, in light of judgment in the case of Jai Ram Sharma (supra), in case the same is applicable, within a period of six Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saryu Prasad Tiwari, Ruby Choudhary Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Om Prakash Saxena And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Irrigation Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
weeks, from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
5. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. November 27, 2025 lakshman WRIA No. 5322 of 2024 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench