Allahabad High Court
/11169/2025 of RAM DARSHAN AND OTHERS Vs CONSOLIDATION OFFICER - IST, SULTANPUR AND OTHERS on 27 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11169 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Heard Shri Udai Pratap Lal, learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. This petition seeks issuance of direction in
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11169 of 2025
Court No. - 10
HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Shri Udai Pratap Lal, learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of mandamus directing to opposite party no.2 not to dispossess the petitioner without the order of the competent Court (Executing Court).
3. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that despite the pendency of the contempt petition before this Court and the execution proceedings, opposite party no.2 is harassing the petitioner at the instance of private opposite parties.
4. Learned A.G.A., on the basis of instructions dated 24.11.2025 received from S.I. Ram Ugah Kushwaha, Police Station Kudwar, district Sultanpur, submits that though a police team had gone to the disputed land, however, on coming to know about the pendency of the proceedings, no action has been taken and the police is not interfering in any manner. She submits that this petition is misconceived as it has been filed on baseless ground. Instruction dated 24.11.2025 is taken on record.
5. Learned Counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid contention of the learned A.G.A.
6. Dismissed accordingly.
November 27, 2025 Ajit Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Udai Pratap Lal Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Ram Darshan And Others .....Petitioner(s) Consolidation Officer - Ist, Sultanpur And Others .....Respondent(s)
Digitally signed by :- AJIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench