Allahabad High Court
/13538/2025 of KANGAL RAM AND 4 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 27 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13538 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Amendment Application field today is taken on record. 3. Since the same pertains
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 13538 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Amendment Application field today is taken on record.
3. Since the same pertains to lis already claimed, the same is allowed.
4. Consequential amendments in the memorandum of petition shall be incorporated during course of the day.
5. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned for grant of revised annual increment in terms of Government Order dated 22.12.2016.
6. Since considering petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to file fresh individual representations before opposite party no.4 i.e. District Development Officer, Ghazipur. In case such representations are filed, the same are required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of six weeks from receipt of representation(s) of petitioners along with a certified copy of this order.
7. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. November 27, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anshuman Singh Rathore Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Kangal Ram And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Rural Development Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench