Allahabad High Court
/11091/2025 of SMT. SAHAJADI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS on 26 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11091 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA appearing on behalf of the respondents no. 1 to 3 and Mohd. Irfan Siddiqui, Advocate who
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11091 of 2025
Court No. - 11
HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA appearing on behalf of the respondents no. 1 to 3 and Mohd. Irfan Siddiqui, Advocate who has filed his Vakalatnama today in Court on behalf of the respondents no. 4 to 7 which is taken on record.
2. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the First Information Report dated 05.11.2025 registered as Case Crime No. 213 of 2025 under Sections 351 (3), 352, 115 (2) of B.N.S, 2023 at Police Station- Rehra Bazar District- Balrampur, a copy of which is annexure 1 to the writ petition lodged against the private respondents/co-accused, the respondents-authorities are not proceeding in the matter.
3. On the other hand, learned AGA states that a notice under Section 35
(3) of B.N.S, 2023 has already been issued as the offences as are indicated in the impugned First Information Report all involve a sentence of less than seven years. However, learned AGA fairly states that the statement of the petitioner has not been taken till date.
4. Learned AGA further fairly states that an endevour would be made to conclude the investigation in a fair manner.
5. Considering the aforesaid, let the petitioner appear before the competent authority for recording of her statement on 05.12.2025 on which date the statement would be recorded and thereafter the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dhananjai Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Smt. Sahajadi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
respondents-authorities shall conclude the investigation in accordance with law within a specified time.
6. Disposed of. November 26, 2025 Pachhere/- CRLP No. 11091 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench