Allahabad High Court
CRLP/11111/2025 of RAJIA BANO Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND OTHERS on 25 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11111 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State-respondents. 2. The instant petition has been filed praying
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11111 of 2025
Court No. - 11
HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State-respondents.
2. The instant petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondent No.2 to transfer the investigation of Crime No.365 of 2025, under Sections 85, 70(1), 115(2), 351(3) of B.N.S. and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 as well as Sections 3/4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019, Police Station- Kotwali Bikapur, District Ayodhya.
3. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite the F.I.R. having been lodged on 24.10.2025 under the aforesaid provisions of the B.N.S., 2023, D.P. Act as well as the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019, the respondents-authorities have failed to record the statement of the petitioner under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S.
4. Responding to the aforesaid, learned A.G.A. states on the basis of instructions that the statement of the petitioner under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. has been recorded on 24.11.2025. Further the learned A.G.A. states that medical of the petitioner has also been conducted.
5. Learned A.G.A. also points out that the accused has approached this Court by filing Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.10400 of 2025 in Re: Sakeel Ahamad and Others vs. State of U.P. and Others and this Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prabhat Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Rajia Bano .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
Court, vide order dated 04.11.2025, has referred the matter to the Mediation Centre of this Court and the version of the petitioner can invariably be seen by the Mediation Centre of this Court.
6. Considering the aforesaid, nothing further survives in the petition.
7. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. November 25, 2025 S. Shivhare CRLP No. 11111 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench