Allahabad High Court
A227/6904/2025 of MANMOHAN SINGH AND 4 OTHERS Vs BOARD OF REVENUE, U.P. LKO. THRU. JUDICIAL MEMBER AND 5 OTHERS on 25 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6904 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6904 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to respondents is hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the State-respondents to consider and decide Revision No. 1352 of 2016 Computerized Case No. C20161033001352, U/S 219 of U.P. Revenue Act (Hari Babu Singh & Others Vs. Ramroop Singh) , expeditiously.
4. It is urged that though the matter is being listed but for one reason or the other, the aforesaid case is not being decided.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
6. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1-Judicial member, Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow is directed to decide Revision No. 1352 of 2016 Computerized Case No. C20161033001352, U/S 219 of U.P. Revenue Act (Hari Babu Singh & Others Vs. Ramroop Singh), expeditiously, say Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manzar Ali Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Manmohan Singh And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue, U.P. Lko. Thru. Judicial Member And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
8. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
9. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 25, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 6904 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench