Allahabad High Court
CRLP/1935/2025 of SACHIN KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 25 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1935 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Case called out. None appears for the petitioner despite a notice having been affixed on the notice board that the matter would be taken at 02.15
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1935 of 2025
Court No. - 11
HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Case called out. None appears for the petitioner despite a notice having been affixed on the notice board that the matter would be taken at 02.15 PM..
2. At the very outset, learned AGA on the basis of instructions dated 24.04.2025 sent by Sri Pradeep Kumar, Inspector Police Station- Para District- Lucknow, states that a charge sheet has been submitted before the supervisory authority.
3. Learned AGA further points out that the charge sheet has been filed after collecting credible evidence from perusal of which it emerges that prima facie the crime committed by the petitioner/accused is borne out.
4. Considering the aforesaid, the Court is not expected to hold a mini trial in order to verify the allegations as levelled in the FIR and the charge sheet vis-a-vis the grounds as taken by the petitioner in the instant petition keeping in view the law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Muskan vs. Ishaan Khan (Sataniya) and others; 2025 INSC 1287.
5. Even otherwise, having considered the allegations as levelled in the FIR vis-a-vis the grounds taken by the petitioner in the writ petition no case on merits is made out. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lovekush Pandey, Sarvesh Baranwal Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Krishna Mohan Srivastava, Neelam Chaurasia Sachin Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. November 25, 2025 Pachhere/- CRLP No. 1935 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench