Allahabad High Court
WPIL/1200/2025 of JITENDRA KUMAR MISHRA Vs STATE OF U.P. ITS THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF PANCHAYAT RAJ LKO AND 5 OTHERS on 25 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1200 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. After preliminary inquiries, the District Magistrate, Sultanpur has already initiated a regular inquiry vide order dated 29.07.2025 and a committee
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1200 of 2025
Court No. - 1
HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. After preliminary inquiries, the District Magistrate, Sultanpur has already initiated a regular inquiry vide order dated 29.07.2025 and a committee has also been constituted in this regard vide said order. If there is no other legal impediment then the committee should conclude the inquiry and submit its report to the competent authority at the earliest. Of course, the inquiry will have to be conducted as per law and the affected party, if has right to hearing as per rule and law on the subject, will have to be heard, thereafter, a decision shall be taken by the District Magistrate concerned.
2. We dispose of this petition accordingly.
3. If nothing happens within three months, it shall be open for the petitioner to approach the District Magistrate concerned by way of a representation apprising him about the pendency of the matter who shall then take such action as may be required.
4. We have not at all entered into the merits of the allegations which are subject matter of the inquiry. November 25, 2025 V. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Singh, Gargi Prakash Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Jitendra Kumar Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Its Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Panchayat Raj Lko And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench