Allahabad High Court

WRIA/13501/2025 of KHUSHI RAM Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. CHIEF SECY. GOVT. OF U.P., LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 25 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13501 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties 1 and 3 and Mr. Parth Bhalla, Advocate holding brief on behalf of Mr. Utsav Misra, learned

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - A No. - 13501 of 2025

Court No. - 7

HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties 1 and 3 and Mr. Parth Bhalla, Advocate holding brief on behalf of Mr. Utsav Misra, learned counsel for opposite party no.2.

2. Amendment application filed today is taken on record.

3. Since amendment does not create any new case, the same is allowed.

4. Consequential amendments in the memorandum of petition shall be incorporated during course of the day.

5. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to issue appointment letter to petitioner on the post of Junior Assistant in Department of Medical and Health Services in terms of advertisement no.08- examination/2022.

6. Learned State Counsel has been provided written instructions dated 19.11.2025, a copy of which is taken on record and as per which although petitioner has been selected but appointment letter was not issued in view of pendency of Criminal Case No.71 of 2013 under Sections 147, 504, 506 I.P.C. read with 4/10 of Forest Act in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinod Kumar Tyagi, Adhyatm Singh, Surendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Utsav Mishra Khushi Ram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Chief Secy. Govt. Of U.P., Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)

which charge sheet has been filed on 11.05.2013.

7. Learned counsel for petitioner however submits that opposite parties may be directed to decide petitioner's representation.

8. Considering the innocuous prayer, without adverting to merits of the case, opposite party no.3, i.e. Director (Administration), Medical and Health Services, Government of U.P., Lucknow or any other competent authority is directed to consider and decide representation dated 15.09.2025 preferred by petitioner expeditiously, within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order along with copy of said representation is produced before the authority concerned.

9. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. November 25, 2025 kvg/- WRIA No. 13501 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead