Allahabad High Court
CRLP/11043/2025 of NIDHI GUPTA AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 25 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11043 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard Shri Sachin Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the respondents-State. No notice is being issued to the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11043 of 2025
Court No. - 11
HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Shri Sachin Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the respondents-State. No notice is being issued to the respondent No.4 taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed.
2. Instant writ petition has been filed praying for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents-authorities to ensure the protection of life and liberty of the petitioners.
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the petitioners being major, have got married to each other, yet they are being harassed by the respondents authorities at the instance of respondent No.4. A copy of the marriage certificate is annexed as Annexure-1 to the petition.
4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. on the basis of instructions sent by Shri Virendra Kumar, Sub-Inspector Delhupur, District Pratapgarh dated 12.11.2025 states that an FIR dated 08.10.2022 vide FIR No.56 of 2022 under Sections 366, 360, 120B IPC was lodged against the petitioner No.2. Subsequent thereto, final report No.7 of 2022 has been sent to the learned court on 13.12.2022. It is further stated that the respondents authorities are not harassing the petitioner in any manner. Aforesaid statement is recorded. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Avinash Kumar Sharma, Sachin Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Nidhi Gupta And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. The writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the opposite parties not to interfere in peaceful life and liberty of the petitioners in any manner. November 25, 2025 prateek CRLP No. 11043 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench