Allahabad High Court

CRLP/11173/2025 of RAM RAKHAN SINGH Vs SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, TAHSIL QAISERGANJ, DISTT. BAHRAICH AND 2 OTHERS on 25 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11173 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard Sri Yusuf Uz Zaman Safwi, Advocate holding brief of Sri M.A. Siddiqui, the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the State of U.P. as well as

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11173 of 2025

Court No. - 13

HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Sri Yusuf Uz Zaman Safwi, Advocate holding brief of Sri M.A. Siddiqui, the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the State of U.P. as well as perused the record.

2. The present petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):- "(I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 01.08.2025 passed by the IIIrd Additional District and Session Judge, Bahraich, contained in annexure no.1 to this writ petition.

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties no.2 not to proceed with the matter any further."

3. On being confronted after taking note of the fact that the order impugned dated 01.08.2025 passed by the IIIrd Additional District and Sessions Judge, District- Bahraich (in short "trial court") is simplicitor order of remand, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the present petition, without interfering in the impugned order, be disposed of finally with observation that the Magistrate concerned would conclude the proceedings expeditiously without being influenced by any of the observations made in the impugned order of remand dated 01.08.2025.

4. Taking note of the aforesaid statement of learned counsel for the petitioner, which has not been opposed by learned AGA, the present petition, without interfering in the impugned order, is disposed of finally with an observation that the Magistrate concerned would conclude the proceedings expeditiously without being influenced by any of the observations made in the impugned order of remand dated 01.08.2025. November 25, 2025 Arun/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : M.A. Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Ram Rakhan Singh .....Petitioner(s) Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tahsil Qaiserganj, Distt. Bahraich And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead