Allahabad High Court
A227/6884/2025 of SAROJA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. NAYAB TEHSILDAR DIYARA, TEHSIL JAISINGHPUR, SULTANPUR AND ANOTHER on 25 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6884 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kr. Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6884 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kr. Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to respondents is hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the State-respondents to consider and decide Case No. 1199/2024 (Saroj Vs. Rajaram) Computerized Case No. T202404680701199, U/S 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, expeditiously.
4. It is urged that though the matter is being listed but for one reason or the other, the aforesaid case is not being decided.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
6. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1-Nayab Tehsildar, Diyara Tehsil - Jaisinghpur, District Sultanpur is directed to decide Case No. 1199/2024 (Saroj Vs. Rajaram) Computerized Case No. T202404680701199, U/S 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, expeditiously, say within a period of five months Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anurag Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Saroja .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Nayab Tehsildar Diyara, Tehsil Jaisinghpur, Sultanpur And Another .....Respondent(s)
from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
8. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
9. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 25, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 6884 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench