Allahabad High Court
WRIA/13635/2025 of BHAGWAN SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 25 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13635 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking for following main prayers:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 13635 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking for following main prayers:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding opposite parties, particularly opposite party number 2 to consider the claim of the petitioner by providing the entire service benefits by treating the initial appointment of the petitioner as 16.01.2000 as substantive appointment and accordingly entire benefit including promotion and pay scales from 16.01.2000 together with consequential benefit to the petitioner;
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding opposite parties not to create any type of hindrance in providing and treating the services of the petitioner as substantive appointment from his first appointment i.e., 16.01.2000 and not from 08.12.2016;
(iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to provide the entire benefits ratio of the judgment of Pratap Narain Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suneel Kumar Singh Kalhans, Shikha Srivastava, Shobhit Kumar Rastogi, Yogesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Bhagwan Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
Pandey Vs. State of U.P. and others rendered in Writ Petition No. 4031 (S/S) of 2001 as well as decision in the State of U.P. and others Vs. Jag Prasad Chaubey rendered in Special Appeal No. 191 of 2024."
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Board of Revenue U.P., Lucknow through its Chairman, - or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same, in light of judgments indicated in prayer (iii) in case the same are applicable, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. November 25, 2025 lakshman WRIA No. 13635 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench