Allahabad High Court
A227/6905/2025 of ATEEQ AHMAD Vs ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER JUDICIAL, AYODHYA DIVISION, AYODHYA AND OTHERS on 25 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6905 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6905 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to State-respondents not to implement the impugned order dated 30.10.2025 till disposal of application for stay moved in Appeal No. 3559/2025 U/S 24(4) of U.P. Revenue Code and for a direction to maintain status quo on spot in respect of possession of the land of the petitioner and further prayed for disposal of decision on application for stay filed by the petitioner along with aforesaid appeal, expeditiously.
4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner confines his prayer for a suitable direction to respondent No. 1 to consider and decide the stay application filed along with aforesaid appeal.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Accordingly, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, without entering into the merits, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 1 - Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Farooqahmad, Dinesh Kumar, Kshitij Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Ateeq Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) Additional Commissioner Judicial, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s)
consider and decide application for stay moved in Appeal No. 3559/2025 U/S 24(4) of U.P. Revenue Code expeditiously, say, within a period of six weeks from the date, report regarding sufficiency of service is received with regard to the service on respondents and in case there is some legal impediment, it shall also be open for the petitioner to press for grant of ad interim relief in case the case is so made out. November 25, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 6905 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench