Allahabad High Court
WRIA/13646/2025 of SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 25 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13646 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly the following relief:- "I. Issue a writ, direction or order
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 13646 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly the following relief:- "I. Issue a writ, direction or order in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties particularly the opposite party No.1 to make promotion of the petitioner on the post of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Senior Pay scale 15,600 - 39,100/-, Grade Pay Rs.6600/-, Revised Pay Matrix Pay Level-II Rs.67,700- 2,08,700/- w.e.f. 10.2.2021 in place of 8.8.2025, the date, when similarly situated persons were promoted, along with all consequential service benefits including payment of arrears to the petitioner."
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.1 i.e. State of U.P. through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Civil Secretariat, Lok Bhawan, Lucknow - or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. November 25, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Singh, Himanshu Deepak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Santosh Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench