Allahabad High Court

WRIA/13656/2025 of CHANDRA BHAN KUSHWAHA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. COOPERATIVE DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 25 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13656 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State-opposite parties, and perused the material available on record. 2. This petition has been filed seeking a direction to

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - A No. - 13656 of 2025

Court No. - 7

HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State-opposite parties, and perused the material available on record.

2. This petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority for payment of regular pension alongwith arrears with effect from April, 2023 alongwith interest and for regular pension.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in similar circumstances one Pradumn Kumar Dixit, who is also a superannuated Amin of the same department filed Writ-A No.4835 of 2025, Pradhumn Kumar Dixit v. State of U.P. & 2 ors., which was allowed vide order dated 09.05.2025 and the petitioner being similarly situated, is required to be granted same benefit.

4. State Counsel has not been provided any instructions in this matter.

5. Upon consideration of submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and perusal of material on record, it appears that the petitioner Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manish Mani Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Chandra Bhan Kushwaha .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Cooperative Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)

was working in Cooperative Department prior to being superannuated from the post of Cooperative Amin on 30.06.2016. It has been stated that regular pension is not being paid to petitioner due to shortage of funds.

6. Since instructions have not been provided to the learned State Counsel, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before the opposite party No.2/Registrar-cum-Commissioner, Cooperative Societies, Lucknow, who shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is submitted before him.

7. In case, upon consideration of the representation, aforesaid, petitioner is found entitled for the aforesaid benefit in the light of judgment rendered in the case of Pradumn Kumar Dixit (supra), payment of regular pension, arrears of pension thereof shall be ensured within a period of six weeks thereafter.

8. It is also directed that petitioner's representation shall not be rejected on the ground of lack of funds with the Cooperative Department.

9. With the above observations/directions, this writ petition is disposed of. November 25, 2025 Subodh/- WRIA No. 13656 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead